ZDF
Sign inSign up

Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · CVE-2014-0195

The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths…

Published Jun 5, 2014 · catalog updated Jun 17, 2026 · the affected product

Last checked Nov 9, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.

Check this week

CVE-2014-0195 is not in CISA KEV. FIRST estimates a 99.98% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Check whether you run the affected product.

Gaps on this record

  • No plain product name is stored. The page cannot tell you which product to check.
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.

Same product and reporting

Severity
Medium6.8
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
99.98%
Remediation
Version ranges on file
Affected products
cpe mariadb/mariadb · cpe openssl/openssl · cpe opensuse/leap · cpe opensuse/opensuse

The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • cpe mariadb/mariadb< 10.0.13
  • cpe openssl/openssl< 0.9.8za
  • cpe openssl/openssl< 1.0.0m
  • cpe openssl/openssl< 1.0.1h
  • cpe opensuse/leap42.1
  • cpe opensuse/opensuse13.2

How to fix CVE-2014-0195

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

CVE-2014-0195 is not in CISA KEV. FIRST estimates a 99.98% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Check whether you run the affected product.

Which versions are affected?

Compare what you have installed with < 10.0.13, < 0.9.8za, < 1.0.0m, < 1.0.1h, 42.1, 13.2. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

CWE-120: Classic Buffer Overflow. EPSS 99.98%. There is no CISA KEV listing. A public exploit reference is linked in Sources. That is not the same as confirmed exploitation. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Technology hubs

OpenSSL security

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

No public source repository is identified for this product.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Jun 5, 2014 · Monitored products — high

    Detected

    The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.

  2. Jun 17, 2026 · Monitored products — high

    Updated

    The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.

Sources

  • CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2014-0195

    Official CVE identifier

    cve.org
  • Monitored products — criticalVendor advisoryCVE-2014-0195

    The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.

    nvd.nist.gov
  • Monitored products — highVendor advisoryCVE-2014-0195

    The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.

    nvd.nist.gov
  • Metasploit ModulesPublic exploit moduleauxiliary_dos/ssl/dtls_fragment_overflow

    Public module reference (normal). Module source is not copied into this catalog.

    rapid7.com

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Nov 7, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.

  • Metasploit ModulesNov 9, 2026
  • Monitored products — criticalNov 4, 2026
  • CVE.orgNov 2, 2026
  • Monitored products — highNov 1, 2026