Vulnerability · CVE-2025-69419
Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can tr
Published Jan 27, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 15, 2026 · Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname()
Last checked Nov 5, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.
Check if you run it
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2025-69419. EPSS is 0.61%. Act only if a listed version of Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() is installed.
Gaps on this record
- The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname()).
- No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
Same product and reporting
- CVE-2026-84783 · High
- CVE-2026-84782 · High
- CVE-2026-77696 · Low
- CVE-2026-75806 · Medium
- CVE-2026-75805 · Medium
- Severity
- High7.4
- Known exploitation
- Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
- EPSS
- 0.61%
- Remediation
- Version ranges on file
- Affected products
- cpe openssl/openssl · vendor OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.0 <3.0.19
Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can trigger a one byte write before the allocated buffer. Impact summary: The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service. The OPENSSL_uni2utf8() function performs a two-pass conversion of a PKCS#12 BMPString (UTF-16BE) to UTF-8. In the second pass, when emitting UTF-8 bytes, the helper function bmp_to_utf8() incorrectly forwards the remaining UTF-16 source byte count as the destination buffer capacity to UTF8_putc(). For BMP code points above U+07FF, UTF-8 requires three bytes, but the forwarded capacity can be just two bytes. UTF8_putc() then returns -1, and this negative value is added to the output length without validation, causing the length to become negative. The subsequent trailing NUL byte is then written at a negative offset, causing write outside of heap allocated buffer. The vulnerability is reachable via the public PKCS12_get_friendlyname() API when parsing attacker-controlled PKCS#12 files. While PKCS12_parse() uses a different code path that avoids this issue, PKCS12_get_friendlyname() directly invokes the vulnerable function. Exploitation requires an attacker to provide a malicious PKCS#12 file to be parsed by the application and the attacker can just trigger a one zero byte write before the allocated buffer. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS#12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.
Are you affected?
Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.
The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.
- cpe openssl/openssl< 1.1.1ze
- cpe openssl/openssl< 3.0.19
- cpe openssl/openssl< 3.3.6
- cpe openssl/openssl< 3.4.4
- cpe openssl/openssl< 3.5.5
- cpe openssl/openssl< 3.6.1
- vendor OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.0 <3.0.193.0.0 <3.0.19
How to fix CVE-2025-69419
Upgrade
CVE-2025-69419 lists a fix boundary at 1.1.1ze. Compare the installed build with that boundary before you change production.
Version check
Affected < 1.1.1ze
Advisory
Open the cve_org record and follow its fix.
Official advisories
What to do
Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.
Should you patch?
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2025-69419. EPSS is 0.61%. Act only if a listed version of Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() is installed.
Which versions are affected?
Compare what you have installed with OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.0.0 <3.0.19 3.0.0 <3.0.19. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.
What should an analyst verify?
CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. EPSS 0.61%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.
Technology hubs
Code
The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.
Timeline
Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.
Jan 27, 2026 · EUVD
Detected
Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can trigger a one byte write before the allocated buffer. Impact summary: The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service. The OPENSSL_uni2utf8() function
Oct 15, 2026 · EUVD
Updated
Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can trigger a one byte write before the allocated buffer. Impact summary: The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service. The OPENSSL_uni2utf8() function
Sources
- CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2025-69419
Official CVE identifier
cve.org - FIRST EPSSExploitation probabilityCVE-2025-69419
30-day exploitation probability 0.61%
first.org - EUVDVulnerability recordEUVD-2025-206395
Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can trigger a one byte write before the allocated buffer. Impact summary: The out-of-bounds write can caus
euvd.enisa.europa.eu - Monitored products — criticalVendor advisoryCVE-2025-69419
Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can trigger a one byte write before the allocated buffer. Impact summary: The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service. The OPENSSL_uni2utf8() function
nvd.nist.gov
References
Freshness
Last verified in this catalog Nov 5, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.
- FIRST EPSSNov 5, 2026
- Monitored products — criticalNov 4, 2026
- CVE.orgNov 4, 2026
- EUVDNov 2, 2026