Vulnerability · CVE-2026-102663
OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure via Non-Separator-Aware Path Check in Bleve Search
Published Jul 24, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 13, 2026 · OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure
Check if you run it
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-102663. EPSS is 0.21%. Act only if a listed version of OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure is installed.
Gaps on this record
- The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure).
- No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
- Severity
- Medium4.3
- Known exploitation
- Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
- EPSS
- 0.21%
- Remediation
- Advisory link
- Affected products
- Go github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList · Go github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList/v3 · Go github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList/v4
### Summary An authorization bypass and information disclosure vulnerability exists in the search API of . Due to a non-separator-aware path check and unfiltered backend counting, a low-privileged user can bypass their assigned restrictions to discover and access metadata of files residing in unauthorized sibling directories. ### Details This vulnerability stems from two combined logic flaws when the search engine is utilized: 1. **Insecure Path Prefix Validation:** In the search handler ( ), the application attempts to restrict search results to the user's allowed namespace using a simple prefix check: . Because this function is not path-separator aware, a user with a restricted to will successfully pass the authorization check for a completely separate directory named (since "/base2" starts with "/base"). 2. **Unfiltered Total Count Leakage:** The backend ( ) searches the index globally and ignores the boundary. Even if the application later successfully filters out unauthorized items from the array (e.g., via meta password checks), it still returns the raw count provided by the search backend. This allows an attacker to perform blind data-enumeration, confirming the existence of sensitive files outside their namespace by observing the count. ### PoC **Prerequisites:** 1. Log in as an administrator and set the Search Index Mode to . Build the index. 2. Create two directories at the root level: and . 3. Upload a sensitive file into the unauthorized directory: . 4. Create a low-privileged test user and strictly set their to . **Exploitation Steps:** 1. Authenticate as the newly created low-privileged user. 2. Send the following HTTP request to the search API: 3. Observe the response: Due to the prefix bypass ( ), the metadata for will be leaked in the response Content. - Alternatively, even if access is further blocked by folder-level passwords, the Total field will return > 0, allowing the attacker to blindly confirm the existence of the keyword "secret" in unautho
Are you affected?
Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.
The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.
- Go github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenListversion unspecified
- Go github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList/v3version unspecified
- Go github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList/v40 → 4.2.4
How to fix CVE-2026-102663
Recommended remediation
A patch or advisory reference is linked. Open the original publisher for availability by product version.
Official advisories
What to do
Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.
Should you patch?
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-102663. EPSS is 0.21%. Act only if a listed version of OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure is installed.
Which versions are affected?
Compare what you have installed with github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList/v4 0 → 4.2.4. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.
What should an analyst verify?
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information; CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key. EPSS 0.21%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.
Code
The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.
Timeline
Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.
Jul 24, 2026 · Catalog
Detected
### Summary An authorization bypass and information disclosure vulnerability exists in the search API of . Due to a non-separator-aware path check and unfiltered backend counting, a low-privileged user can bypass their assigned restrictions to discover and access metadata of files residing in unauthorized sibling directories. ### Details This vulnerability stems from two combined logic flaws when
Oct 13, 2026 · Catalog
Fix available
Go github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList/v4 0 → 4.2.4
Oct 13, 2026 · Catalog
Updated
### Summary An authorization bypass and information disclosure vulnerability exists in the search API of . Due to a non-separator-aware path check and unfiltered backend counting, a low-privileged user can bypass their assigned restrictions to discover and access metadata of files residing in unauthorized sibling directories. ### Details This vulnerability stems from two combined logic flaws when
Sources
- CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2026-102663
Official CVE identifier
cve.org - FIRST EPSSExploitation probabilityCVE-2026-102663
30-day exploitation probability 0.2%
first.org - GitHub Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
GitHub Advisory Database record mirrored by OSV.
github.com - OpenSSF OSV / OSV ScannerPackage advisoryGHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure via Non-Separator-Aware Path Check in Bleve Search
osv.dev - OpenSSF OSV / OSV ScannerPackage advisoryGO-2026-6113
OpenList: Search metadata/count disclosure via Non-Separator-Aware Path Check in Bleve Search in github.com/OpenListTeam/OpenList
osv.dev
References
Freshness
Last verified in this catalog Oct 18, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.