Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · CVE-2026-104102

copyparty FTP: upload outside defined volumes (limited path traversal)

Published Oct 12, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 15, 2026 · copyparty FTP: upload outside

Check if you run it

No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-104102. EPSS is 0.31%. Act only if a listed version of copyparty FTP: upload outside is installed.

Gaps on this record

  • The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (copyparty FTP: upload outside).
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
Severity
Medium5.3
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
0.31%
Remediation
Version ranges on file
Affected products
PyPI copyparty · pip copyparty · pypi copyparty · vendor 9001 copyparty

The FTP and FTPS server -- if enabled -- would allow uploading to any folder that the copyparty process had permission to write to. The FTP-server is default-disabled, and must be explicitly enabled in the config with global-option or to be affected. Additionally, SFTP was not affected at all; only FTP and FTPS. This was not a full read/write path-traversal; it had the following limitations: * Only applied to uploads; it was not possible to read/download existing files in this manner. * The output filename was not fully controllable; a randomized suffix would always be appended to the filename. * Existing files could not be overwritten or appended to; only new files could be created. * Filesystem-permissions would prevent writing to system folders, as copyparty surely does not run as root in most deployments. * Copyparty itself will not execute arbitrary files as code by default, so this vulnerability could not be used to execute arbitrary code through copyparty. The main concern is the potential effect on other unrelated software which is running on the same system. The severity is assuming the worst case (SC:H/SI:H), that the same machine is running some unrelated software that will execute new arbitrarily-named files as code, and that the copyparty process has sufficient privileges to write files into the config-folder of that unrelated software.

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • PyPI copyparty0 → 1.20.19
  • pip copyparty< 1.20.19
  • pypi copypartyversion unspecified
  • vendor 9001 copypartyversion unspecified

How to fix CVE-2026-104102

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-104102. EPSS is 0.31%. Act only if a listed version of copyparty FTP: upload outside is installed.

Which versions are affected?

Compare what you have installed with 0 → 1.20.19, < 1.20.19. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

CWE-22: Path Traversal. EPSS 0.31%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Oct 15, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Detected

    The FTP and FTPS server -- if enabled -- would allow uploading to any folder that the copyparty process had permission to write to. The FTP-server is default-disabled, and must be explicitly enabled in the config with global-option or to be affected. Additionally, SFTP was not affected at all; only FTP and FTPS. This was not a full read/write path-traversal; it had the following limitations: * Onl

  2. Oct 15, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Fix available

    copyparty fixed in 1.20.19

  3. Oct 15, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Fix available

    copyparty fixed in 1.20.19

  4. Oct 15, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Updated

    The FTP and FTPS server -- if enabled -- would allow uploading to any folder that the copyparty process had permission to write to. The FTP-server is default-disabled, and must be explicitly enabled in the config with global-option or to be affected. Additionally, SFTP was not affected at all; only FTP and FTPS. This was not a full read/write path-traversal; it had the following limitations: * Onl

Sources

  • CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2026-104102

    copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to 1.20.19, FTP upload path handling does not confine destinations to configured copyparty volumes. When FTP or FTPS is explicitly enabled, a low-privileged authenticated user can submit traversal paths during upload to create a new file

    cve.org
  • FIRST EPSSExploitation probabilityCVE-2026-104102

    30-day exploitation probability 0.3%

    first.org
  • GitHub Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-phv8-wgjp-g4p9

    copyparty FTP: upload outside defined volumes (limited path traversal)

    github.com
  • GitLab Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryCVE-2026-104102

    The FTP and FTPS server &ndash; if enabled &ndash; would allow uploading to any folder that the copyparty process had permission to write to. The FTP-server is default-disabled, and must be explicitly enabled in the config with global-option ftp or ftps to be affected. Additionally, SFTP was not affected at all; only FTP and FTPS. This was not a full read/write path-traversal; it had the following

    advisories.gitlab.com
  • OpenSSF OSV / OSV ScannerPackage advisoryGHSA-phv8-wgjp-g4p9

    copyparty FTP: upload outside defined volumes (limited path traversal)

    osv.dev
  • PyPA Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-phv8-wgjp-g4p9

    copyparty FTP: upload outside defined volumes (limited path traversal)

    osv.dev

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Oct 18, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.