ZDF
Sign inSign up

Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · CVE-2026-113733

Password hash disclosure to "view only" admin users with custom user models

Published Nov 3, 2026 · catalog updated Nov 3, 2026 · Django

Last checked Nov 4, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.

Check if you run it

No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-113733. EPSS is 0.39%. Act only if a listed version of Django is installed.

Gaps on this record

  • No version range is stored. A customer cannot check an installed version against this record.
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.

Same product and reporting

Severity
Low2.2
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
0.39%
Remediation
Advisory link
Affected products
vendor djangoproject Django

An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3 and 6.0 before 6.0.10. The function did not obfuscate the password field of user models other than , or of an inheriting its password field from a concrete parent model through multi-table inheritance, which allows authenticated staff users with only the view permission on such a model to obtain full password hashes via the read-only change form. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Aaron chen for reporting this issue.

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • vendor djangoproject Djangoversion unspecified

How to fix CVE-2026-113733

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-113733. EPSS is 0.39%. Act only if a listed version of Django is installed.

Which versions are affected?

Affected version ranges are not on this record. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials. EPSS 0.39%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Technology hubs

Django security

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Nov 3, 2026 · CVE.org

    Updated

    An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3 and 6.0 before 6.0.10. The function did not obfuscate the password field of user models other than , or of an inheriting its password field from a concrete parent model through multi-table inheritance, which allows authenticated staff users with only the view permission on such a model to obtain full password hashes via the read-only change form.

  2. Nov 4, 2026 · BSI CERT-Bund

    Detected

    CVE-2026-113733 is listed by Django: Mehrere Schwachstellen.

Sources

  • BSI CERT-BundGovernment advisoryCVE-2026-113733

    Django: Mehrere Schwachstellen

    wid.cert-bund.de
  • CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2026-113733

    An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3 and 6.0 before 6.0.10. The function did not obfuscate the password field of user models other than , or of an inheriting its password field from a concrete parent model through multi-table inheritance, which allows authenticated

    cve.org
  • Openwall OSS SecurityThreat researchCVE-2026-113733

    Research mention from Openwall OSS Security. Not confirmation of exploitation.

    openwall.com

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Nov 4, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.

  • CVE.orgNov 4, 2026
  • Openwall OSS SecurityNov 4, 2026
  • BSI CERT-BundNov 4, 2026