ZDF
Sign inSign up

Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · CVE-2026-35022

This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA).

Published Apr 6, 2026 · catalog updated May 29, 2026 · VulnCheck

Last checked Nov 10, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.

Check this week

CVE-2026-35022 is not in CISA KEV. FIRST estimates a 60.00% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Check whether you run VulnCheck.

Gaps on this record

  • No version range is stored. A customer cannot check an installed version against this record.
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
Severity
Critical9.3
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
60.00%
Remediation
Vendor / distro source
Affected products
vendor VulnCheck

This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the -p flag behavior is documented in Anthropic's claude -h output with an explicit warning that non-interactive mode should only be used in trusted directories, making this intended and described behavior rather than a vulnerability.

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • vendor VulnCheckversion unspecified

How to fix CVE-2026-35022

  • No stored fix

    No vendor fix text is stored. Use the linked advisory before you change production.

  • Version check

    No version range is stored, so an installed version cannot be checked on this page.

  • Advisory

    Open the cve_org record and follow its fix.

  • Official advisories

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

CVE-2026-35022 is not in CISA KEV. FIRST estimates a 60.00% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Check whether you run VulnCheck.

Which versions are affected?

Affected version ranges are not on this record. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

No weakness class is stored. EPSS 60.00%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

No public source repository is identified for this product.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Apr 6, 2026 · EUVD

    Detected

    This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the -p flag behavior is documented in Anthropic's claude -h output with an explicit warning that non-interactive mode should only be used in trusted directories, making this intended and described behavior rather than a vulnerability.

  2. May 29, 2026 · EUVD

    Updated

    This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the -p flag behavior is documented in Anthropic's claude -h output with an explicit warning that non-interactive mode should only be used in trusted directories, making this intended and described behavior rather than a vulnerability.

Sources

  • CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2026-35022

    Official CVE identifier

    cve.org
  • EUVDVulnerability recordEUVD-2026-19442

    This CVE ID has been rejected by its CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). It was determined that the -p flag behavior is documented in Anthropic's claude -h output with an explicit warning that non-interactive mode should only be used in trusted directories, making this intended and de

    euvd.enisa.europa.eu

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog May 29, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.

  • CVE.orgNov 10, 2026
  • EUVDNov 10, 2026