Vulnerability · CVE-2026-54283
request.form() limits silently ignored for application/x-www-form-urlencoded enable DoS
Published Jun 12, 2026 · catalog updated Jun 12, 2026 · request.form() limits silently ignored
Last checked Nov 2, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.
Check if you run it
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-54283. EPSS is 0.48%. Act only if a listed version of request.form() limits silently ignored is installed.
Gaps on this record
- The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (request.form() limits silently ignored).
- No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
- Severity
- High7.5
- Known exploitation
- Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
- EPSS
- 0.48%
- Remediation
- Version ranges on file
- Affected products
- pip starlette
### Summary accepts and to bound resource consumption while parsing form data. These limits are enforced for , but silently ignored for . An unauthenticated attacker can therefore send a urlencoded body with an arbitrarily large number of fields or an arbitrarily large field, even when the application configured limits it believed would apply. ### Details dispatches to a different parser depending on the . For the , , and limits are forwarded to the parser, but for the parser is constructed without them. It has no or parameter to receive them, and it appends every field with no count check and accumulates each field's name and value with no size check. The configured limits are therefore both unreachable and unenforced for url-encoded bodies. Because the url-encoded parser does its work synchronously between stream reads, the two attack shapes have different effects: - **Field count** drives CPU and event-loop blocking. A body of ~1,000,000 fields (a sub-10MB payload such as ) blocks the worker's event loop for several seconds while parsing, during which the worker serves no other request. - **Field size** drives memory. A single large field value (e.g. a 50MB value) is buffered in full to build the , forcing memory allocation proportional to the request body. The equivalent request is correctly rejected with / . ### Impact This Denial of service (DoS) vulnerability affects all applications built with Starlette (or FastAPI) that call on requests. A single request with a very large number of fields blocks the event loop for several seconds, and a single request with a very large field forces unbounded memory allocation; in either case, parallel requests can render the service unusable. A reverse proxy that enforces a request body size limit reduces but does not eliminate the exposure, since a sub-10MB body is already enough to block the event loop. ### Mitigation Upgrade to a patched version, which forwards and to the url-encoded parser and enforces them while parsin
Are you affected?
Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.
The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.
- pip starlette>= 0.4.1, <1.3.1
How to fix CVE-2026-54283
Upgrade
CVE-2026-54283 lists a fix boundary at 1.3.1. Compare the installed build with that boundary before you change production.
Version check
Affected <1.3.1
Advisory
Open the inventory_github record and follow its fix.
Official advisories
What to do
Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.
Should you patch?
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-54283. EPSS is 0.48%. Act only if a listed version of request.form() limits silently ignored is installed.
Which versions are affected?
Compare what you have installed with >= 0.4.1, <1.3.1. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.
What should an analyst verify?
CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling. EPSS 0.48%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.
Technology hubs
Code
The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.
No public source repository is identified for this product.
Timeline
Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.
Jun 12, 2026 · Maintainer security tabs
Detected
### Summary accepts and to bound resource consumption while parsing form data. These limits are enforced for , but silently ignored for . An unauthenticated attacker can therefore send a urlencoded body with an arbitrarily large number of fields or an arbitrarily large field, even when the application configured limits it believed would apply. ### Details dispatches to a different parser depending
Jun 12, 2026 · Maintainer security tabs
Updated
### Summary accepts and to bound resource consumption while parsing form data. These limits are enforced for , but silently ignored for . An unauthenticated attacker can therefore send a urlencoded body with an arbitrarily large number of fields or an arbitrarily large field, even when the application configured limits it believed would apply. ### Details dispatches to a different parser depending
Sources
- Maintainer security tabsVendor advisoryGHSA-82w8-qh3p-5jfq
### Summary accepts and to bound resource consumption while parsing form data. These limits are enforced for , but silently ignored for . An unauthenticated attacker can therefore send a urlencoded body with an arbitrarily large number of fields or an arbitrarily large field, even when the application configured limits it believed would apply. ### Details dispatches to a different parser depending
github.com
Freshness
Last verified in this catalog Nov 2, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.
- Maintainer security tabsNov 2, 2026