ZDF
Sign inSign up

Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · CVE-2026-8404

An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6.

Published Jun 3, 2026 · catalog updated Jul 21, 2026 · An issue was discovered

Check if you run it

No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-8404. EPSS is 0.43%. Act only if a listed version of An issue was discovered is installed.

Gaps on this record

  • The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (An issue was discovered).
  • No version range is stored. A customer cannot check an installed version against this record.
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
Severity
Low2.3
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
0.43%
Remediation
Advisory link
Affected products
cpe djangoproject/django

An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. in Django does not match response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • cpe djangoproject/djangoversion unspecified

How to fix CVE-2026-8404

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-8404. EPSS is 0.43%. Act only if a listed version of An issue was discovered is installed.

Which versions are affected?

Affected version ranges are not on this record. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

CWE-178. EPSS 0.43%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

No public source repository is identified for this product.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Jun 3, 2026 · NIST NVD

    Detected

    An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. in Django does not match response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django w

  2. Jul 21, 2026 · NIST NVD

    Updated

    An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. in Django does not match response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django w

Sources

  • CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2026-8404

    Official CVE identifier

    cve.org
  • FIRST EPSSExploitation probabilityCVE-2026-8404

    30-day exploitation probability 0.4%

    first.org
  • NIST NVDVulnerability recordCVE-2026-8404

    An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. in Django does not match response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached

    nvd.nist.gov

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Oct 18, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.