ZDF
Sign inSign up

Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · CVE-2026-96400

Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS

Published Oct 13, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 14, 2026 · Gitea migration SSRF to

Check if you run it

No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-96400. EPSS is 0.20%. Act only if a listed version of Gitea migration SSRF to is installed.

Gaps on this record

  • The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (Gitea migration SSRF to).
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
Severity
Medium—
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
0.20%
Remediation
Advisory link
Affected products
Bitnami gitea

With set to a matching entry such as or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as , even when . The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty configuration is not affected.

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • Bitnami gitea0 → 28.0.0

How to fix CVE-2026-96400

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-96400. EPSS is 0.20%. Act only if a listed version of Gitea migration SSRF to is installed.

Which versions are affected?

Compare what you have installed with 0 → 28.0.0. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

No weakness class is stored. EPSS 0.20%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Oct 13, 2026 · Tenable CVE Database

    Detected

    With set to a matching entry such as or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as , even when . The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gi

  2. Oct 14, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Fix available

    gitea fixed in 28.0.0

  3. Oct 14, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Fix available

    gitea fixed in 28.0.0

  4. Oct 14, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Updated

    With set to a matching entry such as or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as , even when . The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gi

Sources

  • CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2026-96400

    Official CVE identifier

    cve.org
  • FIRST EPSSExploitation probabilityCVE-2026-96400

    30-day exploitation probability 0.2%

    first.org
  • GitHub Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-54w9-6cc5-9wj9

    GitHub Advisory Database record mirrored by OSV.

    github.com
  • OpenSSF OSV / OSV ScannerPackage advisoryBIT-gitea-2026-96400

    Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS

    osv.dev
  • Tenable CVE DatabaseVulnerability recordCVE-2026-96400

    With set to a matching entry such as or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as , even when . The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gi

    tenable.com

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Oct 18, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.