Security fix · CVE-2026-96643
Pillow is a Python imaging library.
Published Oct 21, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 28, 2026 · Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Last checked Oct 31, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.
Check if you run it
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-96643. EPSS is 0.37%. Act only if a listed version of Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux is installed.
Gaps on this record
- No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
Same product and reporting
- CVE-2026-120210 · Medium
- CVE-2026-118938 · High
- CVE-2026-16760 · High
- CVE-2026-119341 · Medium
- CVE-2026-119340 · Medium
- Severity
- High7.5
- Known exploitation
- Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
- EPSS
- 0.37%
- Remediation
- Version ranges on file
- Affected products
- PyPI pillow · pip Pillow · pypi pillow
### Summary A PNG file with a large eXIf chunk full of repeated 6-byte markers makes Pillow's EXIF parser take seconds of CPU instead of milliseconds. The cost grows with the square of the chunk size, so a normal small-photo-sized file is enough to cause real delay. ### Details in strips a marker from the start of the EXIF data like this: Each pass makes a new copy of the remaining data. A real camera writes this marker once, so this is not normally a problem. in puts the raw PNG eXIf chunk straight into with no size limit and no check of its content. PNG text chunks (tEXt, zTXt, iTXt) are capped with and . The eXIf chunk has no such cap. If the eXIf chunk is filled with repeated markers instead of real EXIF data, the strip loop runs once per marker, copying a large buffer each time. This is a classic quadratic time bug. ### Steps to reproduce This builds a small PNG in memory and times on it. No external file needed. Expected output on a fixed version: well under 0.1 seconds, the same as a normal file this size. Actual output on the current code: around 3.5 to 3.7 seconds, for a single 1.8MB file. We checked with a prohis time is spent inside the strip loop itself, not somewhere else. We also checked the growth rate across a few sizes (200KB, 600KB, 1.2MB, 1.8MB) and it matches quadratic growth closely, not linear. A pytest version of this test, using so a test run does not hang if the bug is present, is it fails with . ### Impact - Availability: an attacker who can get one PNG file processed can burn several seconds of CPU per request w A bigger file scales worse, since the cost is quadratic, not linear. - Confidentiality: none. - Integrity: none. - This fires through , , and . is the function Pillow's own docs recommend for auto-rotating user photos, so this can hit normal upload handling code, not just an unusual call.
Are you affected?
Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.
The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.
- PyPI pillow11.0.0 → 13.0.0
- pip Pillow>= 11.0.0, < 13.0.0
- pypi pillowversion unspecified
How to fix CVE-2026-96643
Upgrade
CVE-2026-96643 lists a fix boundary at 13.0.0. Compare the installed build with that boundary before you change production.
Version check
Affected < 13.0.0
Advisory
Open the cve_org record and follow its fix.
Official advisories
What to do
Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.
Should you patch?
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-96643. EPSS is 0.37%. Act only if a listed version of Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux is installed.
Which versions are affected?
Compare what you have installed with Pillow >= 11.0.0, < 13.0.0. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.
What should an analyst verify?
CWE-407; CWE-606. EPSS 0.37%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.
Technology hubs
Code
The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.
Timeline
Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.
Oct 21, 2026 · NIST NVD
Detected
Pillow is a Python imaging library. From 11.0.0 until 13.0.0, Exif.load() in src/PIL/Image.py repeatedly slices the remaining EXIF data while it begins with the six-byte Exif header. src/PIL/PngImagePlugin.py accepts an uncapped PNG eXIf chunk, so a file filled with repeated headers causes a new shrinking copy on every iteration and quadratic CPU work. The condition is reachable through Image.gete
Oct 22, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database
Updated
### Summary A PNG file with a large eXIf chunk full of repeated 6-byte markers makes Pillow's EXIF parser take seconds of CPU instead of milliseconds. The cost grows with the square of the chunk size, so a normal small-photo-sized file is enough to cause real delay. ### Details in strips a marker from the start of the EXIF data like this: Each pass makes a new copy of the remaining data. A real ca
Oct 28, 2026 · PyPA Advisory Database
Fix available
pillow fixed in 13.0.0
Oct 28, 2026 · PyPA Advisory Database
Fix available
pillow fixed in 13.0.0
Oct 28, 2026 · PyPA Advisory Database
Updated
### Summary A PNG file with a large eXIf chunk full of repeated 6-byte markers makes Pillow's EXIF parser take seconds of CPU instead of milliseconds. The cost grows with the square of the chunk size, so a normal small-photo-sized file is enough to cause real delay. ### Details in strips a marker from the start of the EXIF data like this: Each pass makes a new copy of the remaining data. A real ca
Sources
- CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2026-96643
Official CVE identifier
cve.org - FIRST EPSSExploitation probabilityCVE-2026-96643
30-day exploitation probability 0.37%
first.org - GitHub Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-g4qv-2jxx-769h
Pillow: PNG eXIf chunk makes EXIF parsing run in quadratic time
github.com - GitLab Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryCVE-2026-96643
A PNG file with a large eXIf chunk full of repeated 6-byte markers makes Pillow's EXIF parser take seconds of CPU instead of milliseconds. The cost grows with the square of the chunk size, so a normal small-photo-sized file is enough to cause real delay.
advisories.gitlab.com - NIST NVDVulnerability recordCVE-2026-96643
Pillow is a Python imaging library. From 11.0.0 until 13.0.0, Exif.load() in src/PIL/Image.py repeatedly slices the remaining EXIF data while it begins with the six-byte Exif header. src/PIL/PngImagePlugin.py accepts an uncapped PNG eXIf chunk, so a file filled with repeated head
nvd.nist.gov - PyPA Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-g4qv-2jxx-769h
Pillow: PNG eXIf chunk makes EXIF parsing run in quadratic time
osv.dev - PyPA Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryPYSEC-2026-4342
Pillow is a Python imaging library. From 11.0.0 until 13.0.0, Exif.load() in src/PIL/Image.py repeatedly slices the remaining EXIF data while it begins with the six-byte Exif header. src/PIL/PngImagePlugin.py accepts an uncapped PNG eXIf chunk, so a file filled with repeated head
osv.dev - Red Hat Security DataVendor advisoryCVE-2026-96643
pillow: pillow: Denial of Service via repeated EXIF headers
access.redhat.com
References
Freshness
Last verified in this catalog Oct 31, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.
- PyPA Advisory DatabaseOct 28, 2026
- PyPA Advisory DatabaseOct 28, 2026
- FIRST EPSSOct 28, 2026
- GitLab Advisory DatabaseOct 23, 2026
- GitHub Advisory DatabaseOct 23, 2026
- Red Hat Security DataOct 23, 2026
- CVE.orgOct 22, 2026
- NIST NVDOct 22, 2026