Vulnerability · GHSA-f3fj-9625-rv3m
charmbracelet/soft-serve: Race in leaves a private repository readable by unauthenticated users
Published Oct 30, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 30, 2026 · charmbracelet/soft-serve: Race in leaves
Last checked Nov 4, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.
Open the advisory
Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for GHSA-f3fj-9625-rv3m. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare charmbracelet/soft-serve: Race in leaves with the linked advisory before you change production.
Gaps on this record
- The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (charmbracelet/soft-serve: Race in leaves).
- No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
- EPSS is missing. A missing score is not a low risk.
- Severity
- Medium5.9
- Known exploitation
- Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
- EPSS
- Awaiting synchronization with FIRST
- Remediation
- Advisory link
- Affected products
- Go github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve
## Summary Soft Serve cached repository records in memory with no expiry, and trusted the cached record for every access check. cleared the cached record before it saved the new visibility, and not afterwards. A request that arrived between the two read the old, public record from the database and cached it after the change was saved. From then on every access check used that stale record, so a repository the operator had just made private stayed readable by unauthenticated users over HTTP, SSH, and until the server restarted. ## Impact An unauthenticated attacker can keep reading a repository after it is made private, including everything pushed to it afterwards. The attacker needs no account and no timing knowledge: a client polling , which the default allows, will eventually land in the window when the operator changes the visibility. The stale record lasts until the server restarts or the entry is evicted, and the operator gets no sign of it. reads the database directly and reports , and the webhook is not sent, because its check reads the same stale record. Write access is not gained. Because the repository was public until the change, an attacker able to win the race could already read its contents up to that point. What this adds is continued access to everything pushed after the operator made it private. Deployments that run several Soft Serve processes against one shared database were affected more broadly. Each process kept its own cache, so a visibility change made through one process never reached the others, with no race required. Reachable over HTTP, SSH, and (AV:N). Success depends on a visibility change made by the operator, which the attacker does not control (AC:H). No privileges are required under the default anonymous read access (PR:N), and the attacker interacts with no one, since the operator's change is already captured by AC:H (UI:N). Continued read access to a repository its owner has made private is a high confidentiality impact (C:H), wit
Are you affected?
Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.
The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.
- Go github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve0.6.0 → 0.12.3
How to fix GHSA-f3fj-9625-rv3m
Upgrade
GHSA-f3fj-9625-rv3m lists a fix boundary at 0.12.3. Compare the installed build with that boundary before you change production.
Version check
Seen in 0.6.0 → 0.12.3
Official advisories
What to do
Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.
Should you patch?
Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for GHSA-f3fj-9625-rv3m. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare charmbracelet/soft-serve: Race in leaves with the linked advisory before you change production.
Which versions are affected?
Compare what you have installed with 0.6.0 → 0.12.3. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.
What should an analyst verify?
CWE-362: Race Condition; CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition. EPSS is not on this record yet. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.
Code
The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.
Timeline
Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.
Oct 30, 2026 · Go Vulnerability Database
Detected
## Summary Soft Serve cached repository records in memory with no expiry, and trusted the cached record for every access check. cleared the cached record before it saved the new visibility, and not afterwards. A request that arrived between the two read the old, public record from the database and cached it after the change was saved. From then on every access check used that stale record, so a re
Oct 30, 2026 · Go Vulnerability Database
Fix available
github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve fixed in 0.12.3
Oct 30, 2026 · Go Vulnerability Database
Fix available
github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve fixed in 0.12.3
Oct 30, 2026 · Go Vulnerability Database
Updated
## Summary Soft Serve cached repository records in memory with no expiry, and trusted the cached record for every access check. cleared the cached record before it saved the new visibility, and not afterwards. A request that arrived between the two read the old, public record from the database and cached it after the change was saved. From then on every access check used that stale record, so a re
Sources
- Go Vulnerability DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-f3fj-9625-rv3m
charmbracelet/soft-serve: Race in leaves a private repository readable by unauthenticated users
osv.dev
References
Freshness
Last verified in this catalog Oct 30, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.
- Go Vulnerability DatabaseNov 4, 2026