Vulnerabilities

Security research · GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239

GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses the --upload-pack unsafe-option guard, enabling arbitrary command execution

Published Oct 27, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 27, 2026 · GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses

Last checked Oct 27, 2026, 9 days ago.

Open the advisory

Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses with the linked advisory before you change production.

Gaps on this record

  • The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses).
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
  • EPSS is missing. A missing score is not a low risk.
Severity
High8.1
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
Awaiting synchronization with FIRST
Remediation
Version ranges on file
Affected products
pip GitPython

## Summary in GitPython forwards its positional argument directly to the child process while its unsafe-option guard inspects only keyword arguments. An application that passes attacker-influenced data as the (for example a user-supplied branch or refspec parameter in a web or CI service) can supply an option-shaped value such as . The value bypasses the check, is placed after the separator on the command line, and is executed as the upload-pack program for local-path or SSH transports. This yields arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the calling process using the documented default arguments ( ). ## Root Cause is documented to reject dangerous options unless , and is explicitly listed as such an option. The guard, however, only screens keyword arguments and never the positional . The check builds its candidate list with , passing an empty list in place of the positionals, so the value is never compared against . The normalized is then forwarded verbatim to the invocation. The leading separator that neutralizes an option-shaped refspec for and does not protect , because re-forwards its trailing positionals to an internal without re-inserting a separator, so the positional becomes an option to that internal fetch. ## Impact An attacker who controls the value passed to achieves arbitrary operating-system command execution as the process invoking GitPython, with no additional privileges and no user interaction, on the default code path. Exploitation requires that the pulled remote uses a transport that runs upload-pack on the local side, namely a local filesystem path or SSH; over HTTPS the value is inert because the server ignores a client-supplied upload-pack program. This transport requirement narrows the population of vulnerable deployments but does not add work for the attacker once a vulnerable target is reached. Working checkouts commonly use local-path or SSH origins, so the exposed population is substantial. ## Proof of Concept Reproduction steps

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • pip GitPython>= 3.1.30, < 3.2.0

How to fix GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239

  • Upgrade

    GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239 lists a fix boundary at 3.2.0. Compare the installed build with that boundary before you change production.

  • Version check

    Affected < 3.2.0

  • Official advisories

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses with the linked advisory before you change production.

Which versions are affected?

Compare what you have installed with GitPython >= 3.1.30, < 3.2.0. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

CWE-78: OS Command Injection; CWE-88. EPSS is not on this record yet. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Oct 27, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Detected

    ## Summary in GitPython forwards its positional argument directly to the child process while its unsafe-option guard inspects only keyword arguments. An application that passes attacker-influenced data as the (for example a user-supplied branch or refspec parameter in a web or CI service) can supply an option-shaped value such as . The value bypasses the check, is placed after the separator on the

  2. Oct 27, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Updated

    ## Summary in GitPython forwards its positional argument directly to the child process while its unsafe-option guard inspects only keyword arguments. An application that passes attacker-influenced data as the (for example a user-supplied branch or refspec parameter in a web or CI service) can supply an option-shaped value such as . The value bypasses the check, is placed after the separator on the

Sources

  • GitHub Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239

    GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses the --upload-pack unsafe-option guard, enabling arbitrary command execution

    github.com

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Oct 27, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.

  • GitHub Advisory DatabaseOct 27, 2026