Vulnerability · OSV-2026-564
Use-of-uninitialized-value in DoTestOneInput
Published Apr 12, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 27, 2026 · Use-of-uninitialized-value in DoTestOneInput
Last checked Oct 28, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.
Open the advisory
Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for OSV-2026-564. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare Use-of-uninitialized-value in DoTestOneInput with the linked advisory before you change production.
Gaps on this record
- The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (Use-of-uninitialized-value in DoTestOneInput).
- No version range is stored. A customer cannot check an installed version against this record.
- No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
- EPSS is missing. A missing score is not a low risk.
- Severity
- Unknown—
- Known exploitation
- Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
- EPSS
- Awaiting synchronization with FIRST
- Remediation
- Not established
- Affected products
- OSS-Fuzz libjxl
OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=501356662
Are you affected?
Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.
The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.
- OSS-Fuzz libjxlefd4c04dc1c4 → ec2982b1f79e (github.com/libjxl/libjxl)
How to fix OSV-2026-564
Upgrade
OSV-2026-564 lists a fix boundary at ec2982b1f79e. Compare the installed build with that boundary before you change production.
Version check
No version range is stored, so an installed version cannot be checked on this page.
Official advisories
What to do
Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.
Should you patch?
Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for OSV-2026-564. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare Use-of-uninitialized-value in DoTestOneInput with the linked advisory before you change production.
Which versions are affected?
Compare what you have installed with efd4c04dc1c4 → ec2982b1f79e (github.com/libjxl/libjxl). Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.
What should an analyst verify?
No weakness class is stored. EPSS is not on this record yet. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.
Code
The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.
No public source repository is identified for this product.
Timeline
Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.
Apr 12, 2026 · OpenSSF OSV / OSV Scanner
Detected
OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=501356662
Oct 27, 2026 · OpenSSF OSV / OSV Scanner
Fix available
libjxl fixed in ec2982b1f79e
Oct 27, 2026 · OpenSSF OSV / OSV Scanner
Fix available
libjxl fixed in ec2982b1f79e (github.com/libjxl/libjxl)
Oct 27, 2026 · OpenSSF OSV / OSV Scanner
Updated
OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=501356662
Sources
- OpenSSF OSV / OSV ScannerPackage advisoryOSV-2026-564
Use-of-uninitialized-value in DoTestOneInput
osv.dev
References
Freshness
Last verified in this catalog Oct 27, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.
- OpenSSF OSV / OSV ScannerOct 28, 2026