ZDF
Sign inSign up

Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · RUSTSEC-2026-0499

Signature::from_der reads a signature with bytes after it, a wrong sequence length or an unneeded zero as the signature

Published Nov 11, 2026 · RustSec Rust

Last checked Nov 12, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.

Open the advisory

Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for RUSTSEC-2026-0499. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare RustSec Rust with the linked advisory before you change production.

Gaps on this record

  • No version range is stored. A customer cannot check an installed version against this record.
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
  • EPSS is missing. A missing score is not a low risk.

Same product and reporting

Severity
Unknown—
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
Awaiting synchronization with FIRST
Remediation
Not established
Affected products
RustSec Rust

read a DER-encoded ECDSA signature leniently. It read as the signature: the signature followed by other bytes; a sequence length shorter than its contents, or longer with bytes after them (a length byte with its high bit set among them); and an R or S preceded by a zero byte it did not need. It read a lone-zero R or S as zero. , , , , and read through it, and each verified such a form of a valid signature. Given one signature a key holder made, anyone could produce other byte strings that verify as that signature over the same data. No form verifies over other data: an application that acts on

No affected version ranges are stored yet. Use the vendor advisory before you decide this record does not apply.

How to fix RUSTSEC-2026-0499

  • No stored fix

    No vendor fix text is stored. Use the linked advisory before you change production.

  • Version check

    No version range is stored, so an installed version cannot be checked on this page.

  • Advisory

    Open the rustsec record and follow its fix.

  • Official advisories

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for RUSTSEC-2026-0499. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare RustSec Rust with the linked advisory before you change production.

Which versions are affected?

Affected version ranges are not on this record. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

No weakness class is stored. EPSS is not on this record yet. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

No public source repository is identified for this product.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Nov 11, 2026 · RustSec Advisory DB

    Detected

    read a DER-encoded ECDSA signature leniently. It read as the signature: the signature followed by other bytes; a sequence length shorter than its contents, or longer with bytes after them (a length byte with its high bit set among them); and an R or S preceded by a zero byte it did not need. It read a lone-zero R or S as zero. , , , , and read through it, and each verified such a form of a valid s

Sources

  • RustSec Advisory DBVendor advisoryRUSTSEC-2026-0499

    read a DER-encoded ECDSA signature leniently. It read as the signature: the signature followed by other bytes; a sequence length shorter than its contents, or longer with bytes after them (a length byte with its high bit set among them); and an R or S preceded by a zero byte it d

    crates.io

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Unknown date. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.

  • RustSec Advisory DBNov 12, 2026