Vulnerability · RUSTSEC-2026-0501
Shamir backup recovery accepts a share at x = 0, so a supplied share can substitute the recovered private key
Published Nov 12, 2026 · RustSec Rust
Last checked Nov 12, 2026. A connected source was read within the last 7 days.
Open the advisory
Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for RUSTSEC-2026-0501. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare RustSec Rust with the linked advisory before you change production.
Gaps on this record
- No version range is stored. A customer cannot check an installed version against this record.
- No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
- EPSS is missing. A missing score is not a low risk.
Same product and reporting
- RUSTSEC-2026-0497 · Unknown
- RUSTSEC-2026-0499 · Unknown
- CVE-2026-42067 · Unknown
- CVE-2026-40693 · Unknown
- RUSTSEC-2026-0500 · High
- Severity
- Unknown—
- Known exploitation
- Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
- EPSS
- Awaiting synchronization with FIRST
- Remediation
- Not established
- Affected products
- RustSec Rust
(the Shamir backup share reader, public since 0.2.0, the crate's first release) accepted a share whose x coordinate is 0, and interpolates the shares at x = 0 to recover the key. At an x of 0 the interpolation answers that share's y value alone, so an attacker who supplies one share in that form — with the share's integrity tag ground to match the honest set's — chooses the recovered key outright. The non-canonical zero x = p works the same way, and a repeated x past the threshold window also passed. An application that recovers a Shamir backup from shares it did not produce — a custodian's me
No affected version ranges are stored yet. Use the vendor advisory before you decide this record does not apply.
How to fix RUSTSEC-2026-0501
No stored fix
No vendor fix text is stored. Use the linked advisory before you change production.
Version check
No version range is stored, so an installed version cannot be checked on this page.
Advisory
Open the rustsec record and follow its fix.
Official advisories
What to do
Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.
Should you patch?
Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for RUSTSEC-2026-0501. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare RustSec Rust with the linked advisory before you change production.
Which versions are affected?
Affected version ranges are not on this record. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.
What should an analyst verify?
No weakness class is stored. EPSS is not on this record yet. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.
Code
The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.
No public source repository is identified for this product.
Timeline
Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.
Nov 12, 2026 · RustSec Advisory DB
Detected
(the Shamir backup share reader, public since 0.2.0, the crate's first release) accepted a share whose x coordinate is 0, and interpolates the shares at x = 0 to recover the key. At an x of 0 the interpolation answers that share's y value alone, so an attacker who supplies one share in that form — with the share's integrity tag ground to match the honest set's — chooses the recovered key outright.
Sources
- RustSec Advisory DBVendor advisoryRUSTSEC-2026-0501
(the Shamir backup share reader, public since 0.2.0, the crate's first release) accepted a share whose x coordinate is 0, and interpolates the shares at x = 0 to recover the key. At an x of 0 the interpolation answers that share's y value alone, so an attacker who supplies one sh
crates.io
Freshness
Last verified in this catalog Unknown date. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.
- RustSec Advisory DBNov 12, 2026